Ohio Department of Education
Change Text Size:     A    A    A
Search  
advanced search
Safe Account Sign In Safe Account Sign In
 
  ODE Home > IMS Home > RR > Research
Printer Friendly Version
The Evidence Base for Science: Scientific Inquiry
The Evidence Base for Science: Scientific Inquiry

Scientific Inquiry Bibliography

Anderson, Ronald D. “Reforming Science Teaching: What Research says about Inquiry.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 13:1 (2002): 1-12.

Berg, C. Anders R., V. Christina B. Bergendahl, Bruno K. S. Lundberg and Lena A. E. Tibell. “Benefiting from an Open-Ended Experiment? A Comparison of Attitudes to, and Outcomes of, an Expository versus an Open-Inquiry Version of the Same Experiment.” International Journal of Science Education 25:3 (2003): 351-372.

Cruickshank, Brandon J., and Julie Olander. “Can Problem-based Instruction Stimulate Higher Order Thinking? Converting an Instrument Analysis Lab.” Journal of College Science Teaching 31:6 (2002): 374-377.

Collins, Angelo. “How Students Learn and How Teachers Teach”. Rodger W. Bybee (Ed.) Learning Science and the Science of Learning. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press (3-11), 2002.

Flick, Lawrence B. “Cognitive Scaffolding that Fosters Scientific Inquiry in Middle Level Science.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 11:2 (2000): 109-129.

Gabel, Connie. “Science Inquiry: A Vision for Practice in the Twenty-First Century.” National Association for Research in Science Teaching National Conference, New Orleans LA, April 2002.

Llewellyn, Douglas. Inquire Within. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press, 2002.

Minstrell, Jim, and Virginia Stimpson. “Creating an Environment for Restructuring Understanding and Reasoning.” Proceedings for the Conference on Curriculum and Assessment Reform in Education, Boulder CO, June 1992. 375, 104.

National Research Council. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996.

National Research Council. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000.

Novak, Joseph D. “Learning Science and the Science of Learning.” Studies in Science Education 15 (1988): 77-101.

Ohio Department of Education (ODE). Academic Content Standards, K-12 Science. Columbus, OH: Office of Curriculum and Instruction, 2002.

Rankin, Lynn. “Lessons Learned: Addressing Common Misconceptions about Inquiry” National Science Foundation (Eds.), Foundations (Volume II): Inquiry: Thoughts, Views, and Strategies for the K-5 Classroom (NSF 99-148). Washington, DC: Directorate for Education and Human Resources, Division of Elementary, Secondary, and Informal Education, 1999.

Schauble, Leona, Leopold E. Klopfer, and Kalyani Raghavan. “Students’ Transition from an Engineering Model to a Science Model of Experimentation.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28:9 (1991): 859-882.

Tobin, Kenneth, and Tippins, Deborah. “Constructivism as a Referent for Teaching and Learning.” In Kenneth Tobin (Ed.), The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education. Washington, DC: AAAS Press (3-21), 1993.

Toth, Eva E., Daniel D. Suthers, and Alan M. Lesgold. “Mapping to Know’: The Effects of Representational Guidance and Reflective Assessment on Scientific Inquiry.” Science Education 86:2 (2002): 264-286.

Vasquez, JoAnne. “The Teacher’s Role in Inquiry-Centered Experiences.” Science Education International 9:1 (1998): 21-24.

 
  John R. Kasich, Governor | Deborah S. Delisle, Superintendent of Public Instruction | Contact ODE | Web Site Notes | Contact Web Services | Ohio Home | ODE Intranet | Feedback | Remote Email | ODE Home | Site Map | Jobs