Ohio Department of Education
Change Text Size:     A    A    A
Search  
advanced search
Safe Account Sign In Safe Account Sign In
 
  ODE Home > IMS Home > RR > Research
Printer Friendly Version

Analyzing and Responding in Fine Arts Education
Analyzing and Responding in Fine Arts Education

What We Know

Learning how to respond to their own art and the art works of others, opens students to a multitude of cognitive actions, including perception, and awareness of and sensitivity to media and critical thinking. Students develop perception and sophisticated understanding of the social, historical and cultural contexts in which works of art are produced through viewing art from different times. (Anderson, 2004). Accumulated research confirms that the response to art is an attentive act, one that scans for significant and meaningful details and patterns in the world (Reimer, 2004). Students shift from an experiential to a reflective strategy when they encounter works of art so that the process of perception becomes a subject of thinking (Efland, 2002). This is an important component of metacognition-thinking about thinking. Recent neural research suggests that art experiences impact important connections between affective and cognitive concepts. For example, looking at visual art in a museum setting can enhance students’ abilities to decode and understand illustrations of visual concepts from other domains such as science (Tishman, MacGillivray, and Palmer, 1999). Modern advertising and popular media offer a wide range of appropriate and interesting materials for students to analyze. (Stankiewicz, 2004).

Critical Thinking

Critical thinking is not a fixed ability, but can develop over time, especially when classroom instruction is modified to encourage students to develop critical-thinking dispositions. Perkins and Tishman (2000) view critical thinking not only as a capacity but as a dispositional construct, or habit of mind, with characteristics including thinking ability, inclination to use critical thinking and sensitivity to the contexts in which critical thinking is most appropriate.

Freeman and Parsons (2001) have found that children develop their own intuitive theories of art that guide their responses to it. These theories take extensive time to develop and are often unarticulated. Gradually, students develop more sophisticated perceptions and understandings of the relationships among pictures, artists, subjects and viewers. The authors believe that visual thinking blends with other languages as students move through various operations and develop their theories of the arts within cultural contexts.

Somerville and Hartley (1986) found evidence that arts learning can impact the following components of critical thinking:

  • Identifying categories and the criteria for assigning members to them;
  • Understanding part-whole relationships;
  • Developing rules for sequencing procedures;
  • Understanding the evolution of conventions of representation;
  • Developing self-concept through an individual style.

Incorporating art as a strategic tool for building these skills can help change a rigid, rule-based learning approach into one that is interpretive, imaginative and analytical along a wide spectrum that includes language arts and science (Efland, 2002).

Analysis

When they learn how to respond to art, students develop skills in analysis, including sensitivity to the elements that are essential to the qualities of specific artworks. For example, students in a program focused on Shakespeare learned how to actively read complex texts and developed skills beyond their specific work with Shakespeare’s plays. They were able to transfer these skills to math and physics texts and other literature (Seidel, 2000). The students came to see any text as a puzzle to take apart and fit together again. These findings can be applied to teaching theatre at any age level, including young children.

Evaluation

Evaluation, the process of forming judgments of merit, worth and value, is a skill that has its roots in artistic modes of thinking but transcends multiple disciplines. Children must be free to form their own judgments and to accept responsibility for their decisions. Students progress socially and cognitively through arts learning when they are encouraged to construct their own interpretations of meaning, rather than simply accepting those that come from texts or from teachers (Anderson, 2004). Arts learning helps student form multiple perspectives and understand the layers in relationships (Burton, Horowitz, and Abeles, 2000).


 
  John R. Kasich, Governor | Deborah S. Delisle, Superintendent of Public Instruction | Contact ODE | Web Site Notes | Contact Web Services | Ohio Home | ODE Intranet | Feedback | Remote Email | ODE Home | Site Map | Jobs