Ohio Department of Education
Change Text Size:     A    A    A
Search  
advanced search
Safe Account Sign In Safe Account Sign In
 
  ODE Home > IMS Home
Printer Friendly Version

Focusing on Key Concepts Interpreting Assessment Data Standards Based Planning and Instruction Web Resources OAT Toolkit Home

Standards Based Planning and Instruction in Science

Discussion Questions: Give us Feedback
How can teachers ensure the learning of science content required by Ohio’s Academic Content Standards?
  Science is more than a body of knowledge. Holistically, science is a way of studying the natural world.

Part of implementing a standards-based education program involves examining what students need to be able to do and how that knowledge or skill is to be measured or assessed. Once those skills are identified and clarified, the learning cycle is an effective way to weave instruction, assessment and differentiation practices. The learning cycle ranges from engagement and exploration, to analysis and explanation, to application and extension. It also includes engaging in assessment for learning throughout the cycle.

Within this learning cycle, teachers may use the variety of cognitive demands included below to foster and monitor inquiry-based student learning opportunities. Ohio’s four cognitive demands for science address expected learning outcomes and the guidance of student inquiry as prescribed in all six standards of the Ohio Academic Content Standards, K-12 Science.

Ohio’s cognitive demands are intrinsically related to current understandings and research about how people learn. They provide a structure for teachers to reflect on plans for teaching science and monitoring observable evidence of student learning.

Teachers can use the Guide to Using Cognitive Demand to Reflect on Teaching and Learning to guide and frame formative feedback for each student-generated product. Using the four rubric criteria of the Guide will help teachers with strategic comments and questions. Teachers and science curriculum leaders also may find the Guide helpful in applying the cognitive demands to evaluate and adapt curricular and instructional materials.

A detailed review of the learning cycle can be found in the document Standards-Based Science Instruction and Classroom Inquiry (pp 1-3), available in the Web Resources of the OAT Science Toolkit. This document, as well as the Guide, is adapted from a product developed during Ohio’s participation in the Council of Chief State School Officers, State Collaborative on Assessment and Student Standards Science Project, April 1997.

References and Resources:

National Research Council. National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1996, pp.22-23.

National Research Council of the National Academies. (2007). Taking Science to School Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council of the National Academies. (2006). America's Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
 
  Tools:
 
  • Cognitive Demand (PowerPoint)
  • Guide to Using Cognitive Demands (Word)
  • Evaluation of Cognitive Demand in Science Lessons - Example (Word)
  • Evaluation of Cognitive Demand in Science Lessons - Template (Word)
How do I integrate science process skills into content-based instruction?
  Research in the cognitive sciences has investigated how to sequence science instruction (both content and process) to support students’ science learning. America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science by the National Research Council (2006, p.4) states:

"It has been proposed that integrated instructional units connect laboratory experiences with other types of science learning activities, including lectures, reading and discussions. Students are engaged in framing research questions, making observations, designing and executing experiments, gathering and analyzing data, and constructing scientific arguments and explanations.”

Learning occurs best when content and skills are presented in a meaningful context. It does not occur in isolated fragments of facts and trivia. Teachers build that meaningful context and lead students to knowledge acquisition through inquiry.

Science and Technology, Scientific Inquiry and Scientific Ways of Knowing are standards that describe how to do science through experiments and investigations. The content of scientific experiments and investigations is drawn from grade-band appropriate Earth and Space Sciences, Life Sciences and Physical Sciences standards.

The questions in the Science Process Integration Points to Consider document are designed to assist teachers in evaluating whether a laboratory experience (found on the Web or in a textbook) will aid in teaching science process and content to students. The Aligning of Content and Process PowerPoint will assist teachers in combining content and process standards for instruction and assessment.
 
  Tools:
 
  • Alignment of Content and Process (PowerPoint)
  • Science Process Integration Points to Consider - Example (Word)
  • Science Process Integration Points to Consider - Template (Word)



 
  John R. Kasich, Governor | Deborah S. Delisle, Superintendent of Public Instruction | Contact ODE | Web Site Notes | Contact Web Services | Ohio Home | ODE Intranet | Feedback | Remote Email | ODE Home | Site Map | Jobs